Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking966not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Power efficiency9.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRenoirArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4488192
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00230.4
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs28256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

Graphics has a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 3233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8237 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.