ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 vs Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameRenoirRC410
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 March 2020 (5 years ago)17 October 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate67.200.6
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 17 October 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and Radeon Xpress 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 93 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 30 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or Radeon Xpress 1100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.