RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.03
Power efficiencyno data45.18
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirAD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 March 2020 (6 years ago)12 February 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122816
Core clock speed400 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20187.4
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3288
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22
L1 Cacheno data2.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Graphics 512SP has 367% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 98 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 94 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.