Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs Radeon Graphics 512SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRenoirGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 March 2020 (5 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240 ×4
Core clock speed400 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2051.84 ×4
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs832 ×4
TMUs3280 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2020 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 11 years, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 93 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.