Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLucienneEXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed300 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate60.8033.86
Floating-point processing power1.946 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 512SP Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.