E9390 PCIe vs Graphics 448SP

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRenoirEllesmere
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years old)15 October 2019 (4 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481792
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1089 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20122.0

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data173 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 6 January 2020 15 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP and Radeon E9390 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe
Radeon E9390 PCIe

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 46 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.