Radeon 8040S vs Graphics 448SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.86
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameRenoirStrix Halo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481024
Core clock speed400 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20179.2
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS5.734 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2864
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Graphics 448SP has 266.7% lower power consumption.

Radeon 8040S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP and Radeon 8040S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 8040S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP
AMD Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 95 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8040S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 448SP or Radeon 8040S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.