RTX A4500 vs Radeon Graphics 448SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated69
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.42
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRenoirGA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4487168
Core clock speed400 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20369.6
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs28224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Graphics 448SP has a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 1233% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP and RTX A4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 95 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 217 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 448SP or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.