GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs Radeon Graphics 448SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRenoirNV36S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate53.201.700
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 18 August 2003
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1757% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 448SP and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 98 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 448SP or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.