Radeon Pro W6400 vs Graphics 384SP
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 309 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 30.76 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Cezanne | Navi 24 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2021 (4 years ago) | 19 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 2331 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2331 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | 5,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 111.9 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.306 TFLOPS | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 12 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 8 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 April 2021 | 19 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Graphics 384SP has 11.1% lower power consumption.
Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
