GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs Radeon Graphics 384SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated34
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.50
Power efficiencyno data14.10
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCezanneGA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (5 years ago)31 May 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410240
Core clock speed300 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80532.8
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS34.1 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs24320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data912.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 350 Watt

Graphics 384SP has a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 678% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12955 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.