CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon Graphics 384SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCezanneGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844480
Core clock speed300 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80394.8
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x4
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.49 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 1 September 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

Graphics 384SP has 455.6% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 109 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.