RTX A5000 Max-Q vs Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRenoirGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed400 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate36.00259.2
Floating-point processing power1.152 TFLOPS16.59 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile and RTX A5000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q
RTX A5000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile or RTX A5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.