Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRenoirGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate36.00192.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.152 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs24128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile or Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.