Arc Pro B70 vs Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRenoirBMG-G31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)26 March 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$949

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed400 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate36.00716.8
Floating-point processing power1.152 TFLOPS22.94 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 26 March 2026
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 230 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has 1433.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B70, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile and Arc Pro B70. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B70 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Pro B70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile or Arc Pro B70, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.