Radeon HD 6320 vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.50
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRenoirLoveland
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)15 August 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$554.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed400 MHz508 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million450 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate28.004.064
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.08128 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 15 August 2011
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 8 years, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon HD 6320. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 234 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon HD 6320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.