ATI Radeon DDR VIVO SE vs Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameRenoirRage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed400 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.001.098
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs206

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.856 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and Radeon DDR VIVO SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon DDR VIVO SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
ATI Radeon DDR VIVO SE
Radeon DDR VIVO SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or Radeon DDR VIVO SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.