RTX A500 Mobile vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameRenoirGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$90 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1537 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate28.0098.37

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Graphics 320SP and RTX A500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDAno data8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and RTX A500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a desktop card while RTX A500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 72 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.