GeForce FX 5100 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1564
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRenoirNV34 A1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and GeForce FX 5100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5100
GeForce FX 5100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 53 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or GeForce FX 5100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.