FirePro D300 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.75
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRenoirPitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)18 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201280
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0068.00
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data162.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and FirePro D300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while FirePro D300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP
AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or FirePro D300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.