GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile vs Radeon E9550 MXM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameEllesmereAD104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2016 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23047280
Core clock speed1120 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1266 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate182.3399.6
Floating-point processing power5.834 gflops24.24 gflops
ROPs3280
TMUs144240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 175 Watt

E9550 MXM has 84.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9550 MXM and GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9550 MXM is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Radeon E9550 MXM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E9550 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 34 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.