ATI Radeon X1650 PRO vs E9390 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.35
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2019 (5 years ago)1 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed713 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1089 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate122.02.400
Floating-point processing power3.903 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2019 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 44 Watt

E9390 PCIe has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 PRO, on the other hand, has 70.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9390 PCIe and Radeon X1650 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9390 PCIe is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe
Radeon E9390 PCIe
ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9390 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9390 PCIe or Radeon X1650 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.