ATI FirePro V9800P vs Radeon E9260 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBaffinCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2016 (9 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961600
Core clock speed1090 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6068.00
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880
L1 Cache224 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 9 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt

E9260 PCIe has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9260 PCIe and FirePro V9800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9260 PCIe is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800P is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Radeon E9260 PCIe
ATI FirePro V9800P
FirePro V9800P

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9260 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9260 PCIe or FirePro V9800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.