RTX A500 vs Radeon E9260 MXM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.19
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBaffinGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speed1090 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60113.3
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

E9260 MXM has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9260 MXM and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 169 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9260 MXM or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.