ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Radeon E9260 MXM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinRV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 September 2016 (9 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896120
Core clock speed1090 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate57.605.776
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs488
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s19.01 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 28 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 55 Watt

E9260 MXM has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9260 MXM and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9260 MXM or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.