A40 PCIe vs Radeon E9260 MXM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBaffinGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2016 (8 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89610752
Core clock speed1090 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60589.7
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs48336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cache224 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1812 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s695.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2016 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

E9260 MXM has 500% lower power consumption.

A40 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9260 MXM and A40 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook graphics card while A40 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA A40 PCIe
A40 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 89 votes

Rate A40 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E9260 MXM or A40 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.