Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB vs Radeon E9172 MXM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameLexaGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 October 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed1124 MHz1246 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01441.6
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS14.13 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz876 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2017 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

E9172 MXM has an age advantage of 3 months, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E9172 MXM and Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E9172 MXM is a notebook card while Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
Radeon E9172 MXM
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9172 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 20 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.