Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Radeon E9172 MXM

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	191
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	6.19
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Lexa	N19E-Q1
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 October 2017 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$2393

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1920
Core clock speed	1124 MHz	945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.01	198.7
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon E9172 MXM and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	MXM Module	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	3 October 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	80 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---