Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon E8870

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated58
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.17
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameSaturnTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 September 2015 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current priceno data$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
Core clock speed1000 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00509.8
Floating-point performance1,536 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 260 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8870 and Quadro RTX 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8870 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8870
Radeon E8870
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 122 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.