UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs Radeon E8860

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVenusRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 January 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640256
Core clock speed575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0025.60
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2014 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8860 and UHD Graphics 770 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 14 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.