Radeon Vega 3 Embedded vs E8860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking739not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVenusPicasso-M
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 January 2014 (12 years ago)2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0014.40
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs4012
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 10 Watt

Vega 3 Embedded has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 270% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8860 and Radeon Vega 3 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Vega 3 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
Radeon Vega 3 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 106 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8860 or Radeon Vega 3 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.