Tiger Lake GT1 vs Radeon E6760
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 857 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
GPU code name | Turks | Tiger Lake GT1 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 May 2011 (13 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 716 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | no data |
ROPs | 8 | 8 |
TMUs | 24 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | no data |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Tiger Lake GT1 has a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and Tiger Lake GT1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.