GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Radeon E6760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking921not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency3.47no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTurksGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2011 (14 years ago)23 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480192
Core clock speed600 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4036.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs828
TMUs2464
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 23 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 182 Watt

Radeon E6760 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 304.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 or GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.