GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs Radeon E6760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking898not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency3.51no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTurksGF116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2011 (14 years ago)11 July 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480144
Core clock speed600 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4018.79
Floating-point processing powerno data0.451 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 11 July 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 106 Watt

Radeon E6760 has 135.6% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.