FirePro M3900 vs Radeon E6760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking928not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency3.47no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTurksSeymour
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 May 2011 (14 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480160
Core clock speed600 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors716 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate14.406.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 19 October 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 20 Watt

Radeon E6760 has an age advantage of 6 months.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.