Radeon Pro V520 vs E6760 MXM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.03
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTurksNavi 12
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 May 2011 (15 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802304
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40230.4
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24144
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2011 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

E6760 MXM has 400% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6760 MXM and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 MXM is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 MXM or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.