Tesla T10 Processor vs Radeon E6465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.69no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCaicosGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 September 2015 (10 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160240
Core clock speed600 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors370 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80048.80
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 188 Watt

Radeon E6465 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 652% lower power consumption.

Tesla T10 Processor, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6465 and Tesla T10 Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E6465 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla T10 Processor is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6465
Radeon E6465
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Tesla T10 Processor

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E6465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 17 votes

Rate Tesla T10 Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6465 or Tesla T10 Processor, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.