Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs E6460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCaicosFenghuang
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 April 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt

Radeon E6460 has 300% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E6460 and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6460
Radeon E6460
AMD Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E6460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6460 or Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.