Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs ATI E4690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1166not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.49no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV730Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2009 (16 years ago)23 February 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32064
Core clock speed600 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors514 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.203.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.1
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2009 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

R1E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E4690 and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E4690 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E4690 or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.