Quadro4 750 XGL vs ATI Radeon E2400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1495not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRV610NV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed600 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors180 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.4002.200
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs48
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz225 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

ATI E2400 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E2400 and Quadro4 750 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E2400 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400
NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E2400 or Quadro4 750 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.