Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs ATI DDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.52
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRage 6Vega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2000 (26 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed166 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1102.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.284 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs680
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz740 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2000 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 100 Watt

ATI DDR has 335% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 20, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon DDR or Radeon Pro Vega 20, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.