Tesla S1070 vs ATI Radeon DDR VIVO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRage 6GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×4
Core clock speed183 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors30 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data800 Watt
Texture fill rate1.09848.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs232 ×4
TMUs680 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed183 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.856 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

Tesla S1070 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR VIVO and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR VIVO is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S1070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon DDR VIVO
Radeon DDR VIVO
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Tesla S1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon DDR VIVO or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.