Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs ATI DDR VIVO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.85
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRage 6Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)19 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed183 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors30 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.098375.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs6256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed183 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.856 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 64X has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR VIVO and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR VIVO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon DDR VIVO or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.