Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs ATI DDR VIVO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage 6Renoir
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed183 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors30 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.09836.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed183 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.856 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon DDR VIVO and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon DDR VIVO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon DDR VIVO
Radeon DDR VIVO
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon DDR VIVO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon DDR VIVO or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.