N1X 48SM vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.13no data
Power efficiency16.88no data
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 48GB20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40966144
Core clock speed1660 MHz741 MHz
Boost clock speed2920 MHz2346 MHz
Number of transistors53,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate747.5900.9
Floating-point processing power47.84 TFLOPS28.83 TFLOPS
ROPs12848
TMUs256384
Tensor Cores128192
Ray Tracing Cores6448
L0 Cache1 MBno data
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cache8 MB50 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth644.6 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a1x HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2025 1 June 2026
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

AI PRO R9700 has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

N1X 48SM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon AI PRO R9700 and N1X 48SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation graphics card while N1X 48SM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 35 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1X 48SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon AI PRO R9700 or N1X 48SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.