Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs ATI 9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1494not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.29no data
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR350Fenghuang
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed290 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.56 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 100 Watt

ATI 9800 has 170.3% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800
Radeon 9800
AMD Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 or Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.