Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI 9800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1497not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.17no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR360Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed412 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors117 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate3.296336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed365 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth23.36 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 230 Watt

ATI 9800 XT has 283% lower power consumption.

Pro V320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 XT and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 25 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 XT or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.