ATI FirePro V8750 vs ATI Radeon 9800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.17no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR360RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)28 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed412 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors117 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate3.29630.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed365 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth23.36 GB/s115.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 28 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 151 Watt

ATI 9800 XT has 151.7% lower power consumption.

ATI V8750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 XT and FirePro V8750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 XT is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V8750 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Radeon 9800 XT
ATI FirePro V8750
FirePro V8750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 24 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 XT or FirePro V8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.