Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs ATI 9800 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1535not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR350Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed378 MHz1406 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1677 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.512429.3
ROPs464
TMUs4256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsFloppy2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed297 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL2.04.5
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 64 Liquid has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 SE and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Radeon 9800 SE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 SE or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.