UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1418not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.22no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR350Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed380 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.04024.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed340 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth21.76 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.